Press

15.04.2009

Lviv residents want to primarily elect deputies rather than parties. 49% are opposed to introducing a bicameral Parliament in Ukraine.

  • In spring 2009, rising prices and the devaluation of the hryvnia are becoming increasingly painful issues for Lviv residents. 51.4% believe that the situation in Ukraine is deteriorating, while 40.3% think it is not changing. Only 2.1% of respondents feel that the situation in the country is improving.
  • Only 7.5% of respondents have not felt the effects of the financial and economic crisis in Ukraine. 47.3% have felt the impact of the crisis very seriously, and another 42.9% have felt it to some extent.
  • 85.6% of respondents are most concerned about rising prices (in December it was 73.4%), and 40.3% are concerned about the depreciation of the hryvnia (in December it was 33.9%). At the same time, concern about job losses decreased from 48% to 29.1%, and concern about delayed wage payments decreased from 20.1% to 12.5%.
  • 58% of respondents personally are ready to take part in various protest actions, including due to non-payment of salaries or pensions (44.5%), deterioration of their personal financial situation (41.4%), rising prices or utility tariffs (40%), and the tense political situation in the country (33.6%). 22% are ready to protest for money or some form of remuneration.
  • 11.9% are ready to participate in all of the listed protest actions. 33.4% are confident that they will not take part in any of these protest actions.
  • Lviv residents want to primarily elect deputies rather than parties. 49% are against introducing a bicameral Parliament in Ukraine. 26.3% of respondents are ready to support the introduction of a bicameral Parliament, while 24.6% are undecided.
  • Residents of Lviv are mostly against early elections. In particular, 47.6% do not support early elections to the Verkhovna Rada (45.5% are in favor), and 52.3% are against early presidential elections (40.9% are in favor). Notably, 37.9% support both early parliamentary and early presidential elections, while 43.9% support neither early presidential nor parliamentary elections.
  • Lviv residents do not support elections being held under the existing proportional electoral system with closed party lists. This applies both to elections to the Verkhovna Rada, where only 10.4% called it optimal, and to local council elections, where only 10% consider it the best option.
  • Respondents view the majoritarian electoral system most favorably. 33.6% consider it the best for parliamentary elections, and 36.6% for local elections. 20.3% believe that a proportional system with open lists is optimal for elections to the Verkhovna Rada, while 17.5% consider it the best for local elections. 22% believe that a mixed system, combining proportional and majoritarian elements, is the best electoral system.
  • In Lviv, the Yatsenyuk Bloc became the leader of electoral support in parliamentary elections. The Hrytsenko Bloc passes the 3% threshold.
  • Since the beginning of the year, support for the Yatsenyuk Bloc has increased from 13.6% to 21.4%, allowing it to overtake the BYuT, which has 19.1%. Third place belongs to Svoboda with 16.5%. More than 3% was received by Our Ukraine (5.3%), the Party of Regions (4.4%), and the Hrytsenko Bloc (3.4%).
  • Voters’ motives in supporting political forces differ. 40% of BYuT supporters have supported this force for a long time and have not become disillusioned with it, while another 40% have become disappointed but still consider it the best among the alternatives. Meanwhile, 82% of Yatsenyuk Bloc supporters and 48% of Svoboda supporters began supporting these forces recently because they became disappointed with others.
  • Notably, 22% of Hrytsenko Bloc supporters support it “out of spite” toward another political force.
  • In Lviv, trust in Yushchenko and Tymoshenko continues to decline. Over the past year, trust in Viktor Yushchenko in Lviv has fallen from 77.3% to 22.8%, and trust in Yulia Tymoshenko has fallen from 85.4% to 37.4%. Distrust in the President stands at 66.9%, and in the Prime Minister at 57.1%.
  • At the same time, since the beginning of the year, trust in all national leaders has declined, most notably in Oleh Tiahnybok (from 56.6% to 42.6%) and Yurii Lutsenko (from 39.3% to 28.9%). The exception is Arsenii Yatsenyuk, whose level of trust has not changed since the beginning of the year.
  • The highest levels of trust among Lviv residents are enjoyed by Yatsenyuk (63.3%), Tiahnybok (42.6%), and Tymoshenko (37.4%). Only Yatsenyuk has a positive trust balance (+35.3%). Respondents were most uncertain in their attitudes toward Anatolii Hrytsenko (18.3%).
  • The politician who is most distrusted in Lviv is traditionally Viktor Yanukovych (89.3%).
  • In the presidential elections in Lviv, Yatsenyuk leads with 23.3%, followed by Tymoshenko with 19.5%, and Tiahnybok with 10.4%. Viktor Yushchenko’s rating has stabilized at 6.9%, and Anatolii Hrytsenko is fifth with 5.5%. 10.8% of respondents would not vote for any of the candidates, and another 9.5% have not decided.
  • It is interesting that in Yulia Tymoshenko’s electorate in Lviv, 59% are women, while among Volodymyr Lytvyn’s voters, 65% are men. The highest shares of voters with higher education are found among Viktor Yanukovych’s and Anatolii Hrytsenko’s supporters.

Methodology

The survey was conducted by Rating Group.

  • Fieldwork dates: 6–12 April 2009.
  • Sample size: 800 respondents aged 18 and older in the city of Lviv.
  • The margin of error does not exceed 3%.
Contact form

Have questions?

Please, fill in the form below and we will reach out to you soon.

Дякуємо! Ваша заявка отримана, ми зв'яжемося з вами у найближчий час.
Ой! Під час відправлення форми сталася помилка.